New Poll: Young Americans Think Democracy Is for Sale. And They're Tired of Playing Along – Independent Voter News
Topics
New polling shows 83% of young Americans believe money in politics is a major problem, and 43% say it discourages them from voting altogether.
New polling data shows most young Americans don’t believe their voices carry nearly as much weight as the wealthy donors funding political campaigns. And that perception is discouraging some from participating in elections altogether.
A poll released Friday by American Promise and public opinion research firm SocialSphere found that 83% of Americans ages 18 to 29 believed money in politics was a big problem, including 58% who described it as a “very big problem.”
But in an election cycle in which candidates are trying to energize younger voters ahead of November, the more troubling finding was that 43% said the influence of money made them less motivated to participate in politics.
Only 24% said it motivated them to get more involved.
This stems from the perception that their vote doesn’t matter as much as the cash candidates receive. When respondents were asked who holds the most influence over decisions in Washington, 38% said wealthy individuals and billionaires.
Only 4% said ordinary voters.
“Today’s broken campaign finance system, in which political spending has had virtually no limits, is the only one that young Americans know,” said American Promise CEO Jeff Clements.
This is not an issue that divides voters. Majorities across the political spectrum believe members of Congress are more influenced by their campaign funders than by their constituents:
More than half of all respondents (52%) said that when people like them vote, organize, contact elected officials, or otherwise speak up, it makes little or no difference.
American Promise notes that the poll measures perceptions and self-reported motivation, not actual voting behavior. Still, the findings indicate that concerns about political money may be contributing to a broader sense of political powerlessness.
The poll was conducted online between September 8-13 and includes responses from 2,026 young adults.
There is consistent data that show broad agreement on this issue. In this poll, 95% of young Democrats described money in politics as a big problem. The same was true for 83% of young Republicans and 78% of independents.
Additionally, 70% of respondents agreed that Congress and state legislatures should have the authority to reasonably regulate and limit money spent on elections and campaigns.
This has been the sole mission of American Promise: To pass a constitutional amendment that allows state and federal lawmakers to establish limits on political spending that won’t immediately be struck down by the courts.
This could mean different rules for individuals and entities such as corporations and unions.
The amendment would not itself impose specific spending limits. Instead, it would restore legislative authority to adopt rules currently constrained by constitutional interpretations of political spending and free speech.
American Promise says 25 states have passed resolutions calling for a constitutional amendment addressing money in politics, including recent action in Idaho, Oklahoma, and Utah.
Young voters were also surveyed on what impact a commitment to campaign finance reform would have on their candidate preferences in the November midterms.
Overall, 70% said a candidate’s position on reducing the influence of money in politics would be important to the choices they make. This included 84% of Democrats, 75% of Republicans, and 61% of independents.
Another 68% agreed that limits on political spending would make them more confident that government represents people like them.
“Every candidate on the ballot this November should take that seriously,” said John Della Volpe, founder and CEO of SocialSphere.
The survey cannot establish whether campaign finance reform would increase turnout. But it does identify a significant disconnect between young Americans’ desire for political influence and their perception of who actually holds power.
After a bipartisan House vote to open the primaries, Gov. Josh Shapiro and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick are adding their support as advocates turn their attention to the state Senate.
Former Massachusetts governors Deval Patrick and Charlie Baker have endorsed Question 3, a November ballot measure that would open the state's primaries to all voters regardless of party affiliation.
Polls are important tools to understand where a race stands, and where the electorate is moving. As with all tools, though, it’s important to understand how to use them.
Independent voters, locked out of primaries in most states, are now the most sought-after voting bloc as candidates distance themselves from party leaders to appeal to the general election electorate.
Massachusetts voters could eliminate party primaries and replace them with an open primary allowing all voters to choose any candidate on a single ballot. Here's what Question 3 would actually change.
With control of the state Senate at stake in November, a handful of competitive races could determine the future of legislation allowing more than 1.5 million independent voters to participate in Pennsylvania's primaries.
Democratic Socialists and the California Working Families Party are fielding 25 candidates across California this fall, with 10 nearly certain to win. The races show how independent voters and the state's open primary system shape the left's push to move the Democratic Party further left.
Candidates who make it on the ballot don't always make it onto debate stages. Debate rules designed by media outlets, commissions, and civic organizations are locking out independent candidates while major party nominees sometimes skip debates altogether.
Trump's controversial LA bombing comment goes viral, but context and selective editing reveal deeper questions about how political clips are weaponized to divide voters.
Critics say ranked choice voting confuses voters, but real-world election data suggests most voters understand the system — and that ballot errors remain rare.
We've been defending and fighting for the voting rights of independent voters for 20 years.
Great! Check your inbox and click the link.
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.
By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.
Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.
Message sent
Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.
Message not sent
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.
Sign in to send a message
Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.
By sending a message, you agree to our terms of service.
